IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Fagan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 36 11 11 22 0.611 0.0894 0.0901 0.2996 0.3019
2023-24 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 45 17 27 44 0.978 0.1431 0.1370 0.4794 0.4589
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Norwich D3 LittleEast SO 19 1 1 2 0.105
2024-25 Norwich D3 LittleEast — 26 3 4 7 0.269
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2024-25 · Norwich
+166.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16546
Forward overall
#825
Forward born in 2003
#308
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Auggie Moore
Saint John's · 2018-19
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Riley Ott
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Bistodeau
Hobart · 2014-15
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.