IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Micaiah Bascombe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-03-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Northeast Generals NA3HL 30 4 7 11 0.367 0.0843 0.0865 0.1162 0.1192
2023-24 Providence Capitals EHL 36 9 9 18 0.500 0.1759 0.1769 0.2452 0.2466
2024-25 Connecticut Nor'Easter EHL 40 15 31 46 1.150 0.4047 0.3862 0.5638 0.5380
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Roger Williams D3 CNE — 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20054
Forward overall
#1074
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joshua McCully
Westfield State · 2009-10
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tim Murphy
UMass Boston · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kelvin Walz
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2013-14
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.