IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Samuel Huck Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-08-31 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 59 12 19 31 0.525 0.1743 0.1896 0.4869 0.5297
2022-23 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 45 22 30 52 1.156 0.3834 0.3981 1.0710 1.1120
2023-24 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 42 28 33 61 1.452 0.4819 0.4776 1.3461 1.3342
2024-25 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 60 16 10 26 0.433 0.2663 0.2440 1.2766 1.1695
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Western Michigan D1 NCHC — 23 4 4 8 0.348
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2025-26 · Western Michigan
+20.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11716
Forward overall
#511
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Braydon Beahm
St. Norbert · 2024-25
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dakota Dubetz
Marian · 2008-09
1.333 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Galati
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
1.241 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.