IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Keith Clarke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-03-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 31 2 0 2 0.065 0.0184 0.0195 0.0499 0.0528
2007-08 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 50 7 9 16 0.320 0.0913 0.0921 0.2477 0.2500
2008-09 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 53 19 18 37 0.698 0.1992 0.1894 0.5404 0.5137
2009-10 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 62 38 36 74 1.194 0.3406 0.3081 0.9239 0.8357
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SR 9 1 0 1 0.111
2012-13 Hobart D3 SUNYAC JR 11 3 3 6 0.545
2011-12 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SO 17 1 5 6 0.353
2010-11 Hobart D3 SUNYAC FR 16 1 2 3 0.188
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2010-11 · Hobart
-16.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15760
Forward overall
#621
Forward born in 1989
#411
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dale Lupul
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
0.759 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Conor Foley
Franklin Pierce · 2018-19
0.710 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Hansberry
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2004-05
1.259 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.