IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Keith Clarke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-03-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 31 2 0 2 0.065 0.0140 0.0148 0.0499 0.0528
2007-08 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 50 7 9 16 0.320 0.0694 0.0700 0.2476 0.2499
2008-09 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 53 19 18 37 0.698 0.1514 0.1439 0.5401 0.5135
2009-10 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 62 38 36 74 1.194 0.2589 0.2342 0.9234 0.8353
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SR 9 1 0 1 0.111
2012-13 Hobart D3 SUNYAC JR 11 3 3 6 0.545
2011-12 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SO 17 1 5 6 0.353
2010-11 Hobart D3 SUNYAC FR 16 1 2 3 0.188
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2010-11 · Hobart
+10.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19471
Forward overall
#654
Forward born in 1989
#334
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dale Lupul
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
0.759 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Russell
Assumption · 2024-25
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Morton
Curry · 2024-25
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.