IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ian Scherzer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-07-03 Country: Austria
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Rögle BK U20 SuperElit 8 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Rögle BK U20 SHL-J20 30 3 4 7 0.233 0.1297 0.1366 0.3108 0.3274
2023-24 Rögle BK U20 SuperElit 35 2 9 11 0.314 0.1240 0.1246 0.4269 0.4289
2024-25 Madison Capitols USHL 39 8 12 20 0.513 0.3025 0.2898 1.5401 1.4755
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 RPI D1 ECAC FR 28 4 5 9 0.321
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2025-26 · RPI
+67.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24497
Forward overall
#1387
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Brett Skibba
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Irwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
Garret Clemment
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
John Simonson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Luc Gerdes
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sean Tyrie
Worcester State · 2023-24
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Johnny Panvica
St. Thomas · 2014-15
0.955 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Michaud
Trinity · 2016-17
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.