← New Search ↗ Social Card

Casey Mutryn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-07-05 Country: USA
2026 NHL Draft Eligible
Boston College
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 St. Sebastian’s NE-Prep 24 2 7 9 0.375 0.0756 0.0756 0.1716 0.1716
2023-24 St. Sebastian’s NE-Prep 28 11 20 31 1.107 0.2232 0.2232 0.5067 0.5067
2024-25 NTDP-U18 66 19 18 37 0.561 0.4459 0.4619 2.0996 2.1748
2025-26 NTDP-U18 56 14 24 38 0.679 0.5398 0.5296 2.5415 2.4935
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

88%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4335
Forward overall
#55
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.75 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.57 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Harvard (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Boston College Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2020-21
0.17
actual FR PPG at Boston College
NTDP-U18 2020-21
0.81
actual FR PPG at Boston College
USHL 2018-19
0.56
actual FR PPG at Boston College
USHL 2019-20
0.58
actual FR PPG at Boston College

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2017-18
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.