← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mason Etter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-07-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 34 2 0 2 0.059 0.0151 0.0158 0.0443 0.0463
2015-16 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 55 7 12 19 0.345 0.0885 0.0880 0.2604 0.2591
2016-17 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 50 8 23 31 0.620 0.1588 0.1501 0.4674 0.4418
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC 25 3 8 11 0.440
2019-20 Gustavus Adolphus D1 MIAC JR 24 1 12 13 0.542
2019-20 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC GR 24 1 12 13 0.542
2018-19 Gustavus Adolphus D1 MIAC SO 24 3 7 10 0.417
2018-19 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 24 3 7 10 0.417
2017-18 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 27 1 8 9 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2017-18 · Gustavus Adolphus
+182.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13767
Defenseman overall
#1872
Defenseman born in 1996
#1141
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2008-09
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2017-18
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.