← New Search ↗ Social Card

Christopher Marinakos Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-06-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Huntsville Otters OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2007-08 Seguin Bruins OJHL 48 14 16 30 0.625 0.1532 0.1554 0.4303 0.4364
2008-09 Seguin Bruins OJHL 45 14 25 39 0.867 0.2124 0.2045 0.5967 0.5746
2009-10 Seguin Bruins OJHL 49 20 22 42 0.857 0.2101 0.1913 0.5901 0.5372
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC 17 4 1 5 0.294
2012-13 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC 7 0 1 1 0.143
2011-12 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC 13 1 0 1 0.077
2010-11 Wentworth D3 CNE 9 0 2 2 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2010-11 · Wentworth
+32.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22446
Forward overall
#755
Forward born in 1989
#962
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Olaf · 2006-07
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2007-08
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2012-13
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.