← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Walters Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1989-01-16 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Orleans Blues CCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2007-08 CCHL 57 3 13 16 0.281 0.0609 0.0609 0.2171 0.2170
2008-09 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 58 3 16 19 0.328 0.0711 0.0669 0.2534 0.2384
2009-10 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 59 7 20 27 0.458 0.0993 0.0889 0.3540 0.3168
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SR 25 1 9 10 0.400
2012-13 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast JR 27 3 15 18 0.667
2011-12 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SO 26 4 6 10 0.385
2010-11 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast FR 16 0 2 2 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2010-11 · Plymouth State
+65.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14166
Defenseman overall
#1409
Defenseman born in 1989
#1191
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nazareth · 2017-18
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2004-05
0.423 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Stevenson · 2024-25
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.