IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Arendes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-01-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Boston Dukes EHL 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 Pennsylvania Huntsmen EHL 45 9 5 14 0.311 0.0455 0.0453 0.1524 0.1516
2024-25 Pennsylvania Huntsmen EHL 44 28 32 60 1.364 0.1996 0.1883 0.6679 0.6301
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Stevenson D3 MAC FR 13 0 3 3 0.231
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2025-26 · Stevenson
+105.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13972
Forward overall
#640
Forward born in 2004
#211
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ben Beaudoin
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2007-08
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tommy Nolan
SUNY Cortland · 2013-14
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Greg Whittle
Elmira · 2011-12
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.