IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Craig Simchuk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-04-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Winnipeg Saints MJHL 61 11 17 28 0.459 0.0884 0.0953 0.2900 0.3125
2007-08 Winnipeg Saints MJHL 62 24 37 61 0.984 0.1894 0.1939 0.6217 0.6365
2008-09 Winnipeg Saints MJHL 60 34 50 84 1.400 0.2695 0.2626 0.8847 0.8621
2009-10 Winnipeg Saints MJHL 51 22 38 60 1.177 0.2265 0.2106 0.7434 0.6911
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 25 7 15 22 0.880
2012-13 Manhattanville D3 UCHC JR 26 5 5 10 0.385
2011-12 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SO 22 6 6 12 0.545
2010-11 Manhattanville D3 UCHC FR 16 0 2 2 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2010-11 · Manhattanville
-36.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14030
Forward overall
#478
Forward born in 1989
#69
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jordan Carvalho
SUNY Morrisville · 2012-13
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trent Krueger
Western New England · 2009-10
0.737 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt McCann
Norwich · 2008-09
0.632 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.