IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Patrick Schmelzinger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-11-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Nipawin Hawks SJHL 11 2 2 4 0.364 0.0932 0.0894 0.2695 0.2586
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Elmira D1 — SR 21 1 2 3 0.143
2019-20 Elmira D3 UCHC SR 21 1 2 3 0.143
2018-19 Elmira D1 — JR 27 2 4 6 0.222
2018-19 Elmira D3 UCHC JR 27 2 4 6 0.222
2017-18 Elmira D3 UCHC SO 24 1 3 4 0.167
2016-17 Elmira D3 UCHC FR 12 0 1 1 0.083
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2016-17 · Elmira
+8.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#44282
Forward overall
#1894
Forward born in 1995
#1274
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Leone
Adrian · 2011-12
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Massa
Nichols · 2024-25
0.481 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Braden Brown
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.