← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bradley Walker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-12-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Orono USHS-MN 27 14 35 49 1.815 0.2298 0.2298 0.4408 0.4408
2020-21 Orono USHS-MN 19 15 12 27 1.421 0.1799 0.1799 0.3452 0.3452
2021-22 Orono USHS-MN 27 25 17 42 1.556 0.1969 0.1969 0.3779 0.3779
2022-23 Orono USHS-MN 31 20 30 50 1.613 0.2042 0.2042 0.3918 0.3918
2023-24 El Paso Rhinos NAHL 59 10 17 27 0.458 0.1681 0.1726 0.4830 0.4960
2024-25 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 57 7 6 13 0.228 0.1346 0.1252 0.6851 0.6374
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Miami D1 NCHC FR 30 3 3 6 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2025-26 · Miami
+62.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25307
Forward overall
#1427
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Finlandia · 2003-04
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2013-14
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2008-09
0.562 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.