IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Badham Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-04-16 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Bramalea Blues OJHL 48 6 10 16 0.333 0.0931 0.0978 0.2300 0.2417
2007-08 Oakville Blades OJHL 47 3 7 10 0.213 0.0595 0.0598 0.1469 0.1477
2008-09 Oakville Blades OJHL 49 17 22 39 0.796 0.2224 0.2122 0.5493 0.5241
2009-10 Oakville Blades OJHL 54 14 45 59 1.093 0.3053 0.2753 0.7540 0.6798
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 SUNY Oswego D3 — SR 15 1 2 3 0.200
2012-13 SUNY Oswego D3 — JR 26 1 5 6 0.231
2011-12 SUNY Oswego D3 — SO 28 4 7 11 0.393
2010-11 SUNY Oswego D3 — FR 4 0 1 1 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2010-11 · SUNY Oswego
+16.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17453
Forward overall
#687
Forward born in 1989
#1200
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matthew Manning
Worcester State · 2016-17
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Marinac
SUNY Brockport · 2012-13
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Thomas Bishop
Suffolk · 2014-15
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.