IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zachary Wilson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-12-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Brockville Braves CCHL 6 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2006-07 — CCHL 26 2 5 7 0.269 0.0584 0.0639 0.2084 0.2282
2007-08 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 55 9 11 20 0.364 0.0789 0.0826 0.2815 0.2947
2008-09 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 60 12 18 30 0.500 0.1085 0.1072 0.3871 0.3826
2009-10 Kemptville 73's CCHL 57 29 24 53 0.930 0.2017 0.1900 0.7198 0.6782
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 23 5 2 7 0.304
2012-13 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 24 5 5 10 0.417
2011-12 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 26 5 4 9 0.346
2010-11 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 5 0 1 1 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2010-11 · Adrian
+48.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26310
Forward overall
#875
Forward born in 1989
#553
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan McDonald
Framingham State · 2007-08
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin MacCormack
Bowdoin · 2004-05
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nolan Zotter
Canton · 2022-23
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.