IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Lutner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-02-21 Country: USA
Denver
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Maple Grove USHS-MN 26 4 9 13 0.500 0.0633 0.0633 0.1215 0.1215
2024-25 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 43 1 13 14 0.326 0.2420 0.2462 1.2149 1.2359
2025-26 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 62 5 10 15 0.242 0.1798 0.1731 0.9026 0.8688
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

72%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7637
Defenseman overall
#475
Defenseman born in 2008

D1 Comparables

Mark Auk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Roy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Josh Couturier
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Boston College (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Steven Santini
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Boston College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jack Stander
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Canisius (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Denver Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Michael Davies
USHL 2014-15
0.39
actual FR PPG at Denver
Blake Hillman
USHL 2013-14
0.28
actual FR PPG at Denver
Justin Lee
MJHL 2017-18
0.19
actual FR PPG at Denver
Lucas Ölvestad
SHL-J20 2019-20
0.18
actual FR PPG at Denver

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Cox
Southern New Hampshire · 2014-15
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Atkinson
Curry · 2005-06
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Wood
Utica · 2017-18
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.