IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luken Huff Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-01-01 Country: USA
2026 · Round 5, Pick #148  ·  Seattle Kraken Seattle Kraken
St. Thomas
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 11 0 1 1 0.091 0.0334 0.0361 0.0961 0.1037
2024-25 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 56 2 8 10 0.179 0.1054 0.1036 0.5359 0.5267
2025-26 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 61 3 36 39 0.639 0.3771 0.3525 1.9183 1.7929
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

88%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5812
Defenseman overall
#1249
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

Barrett Kaib
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Newell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Fleming
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

St. Thomas Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Colton Jamieson
USHL 2024-25
0.11
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas
Chase Cheslock
USHL 2023-24
0.37
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Moodie
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
T.J. Sneath
Lebanon Valley · 2014-15
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bailey Conger
UMass Boston · 2016-17
2.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.