← New Search ↗ Social Card

Donavan Houle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-11-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 58 7 14 21 0.362 0.0928 0.0987 0.2730 0.2904
2018-19 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 51 18 28 46 0.902 0.2311 0.2340 0.6799 0.6883
2019-20 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 46 31 36 67 1.456 0.3732 0.3732 1.0979 1.0979
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Maine D1 HockeyEast 36 9 15 24 0.667
2022-23 Maine D1 HockeyEast 36 9 10 19 0.528
2021-22 Maine D1 HockeyEast 32 10 9 19 0.594
2020-21 Maine D1 HockeyEast 16 0 2 2 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2020-21 · Maine
-18.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14849
Forward overall
#697
Forward born in 1999
#108
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Buffalo State · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2008-09
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
King's · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.