← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Hunt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-02-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Minnesota River USHS-MN 24 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Minnesota River USHS-MN 14 0 6 6 0.429 0.1154 0.1154 0.1041 0.1041
2021-22 Minnesota River USHS-MN 26 1 5 6 0.231 0.0621 0.0621 0.0561 0.0561
2022-23 Milton Academy NE-Prep 27 1 10 11 0.407 0.1149 0.1149 0.1864 0.1864
2023-24 Milton Academy NE-Prep 28 8 31 39 1.393 0.3929 0.3929 0.6374 0.6374
2024-25 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 36 1 6 7 0.194 0.1195 0.1181 0.5727 0.5660
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Yale D1 ECAC FR 31 0 8 8 0.258
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2025-26 · Yale
+19.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6338
Defenseman overall
#1360
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Michigan (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2006-07
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Williams · 2007-08
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wesleyan · 2023-24
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.