← New Search ↗ Social Card

Scott Wentworth Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1987-03-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 26 3 4 7 0.269 0.0584 0.0530 0.2062 0.1870
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SR 17 0 1 1 0.059
2010-11 Curry D3 CNE — 5 0 0 0 0.000
2010-11 Utica D3 UCHC JR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2009-10 Utica D3 UCHC SO 23 0 12 12 0.522
2008-09 Utica D3 UCHC FR 14 1 5 6 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2008-09 · Utica
+757.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19653
Defenseman overall
#1657
Defenseman born in 1987
#1539
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wentworth · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Skidmore · 2024-25
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Western New England · 2021-22
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.