← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carter Stephenson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-03-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 BCHL 8 0 3 3 0.375 0.1445 0.1542 0.5457 0.5824
2016-17 BCHL 53 6 15 21 0.396 0.1527 0.1552 0.5766 0.5859
2017-18 Langley Rivermen BCHL 51 6 17 23 0.451 0.1738 0.1682 0.6563 0.6353
2018-19 BCHL 40 4 11 15 0.375 0.1445 0.1321 0.5457 0.4988
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Wentworth D1 CNE FR 24 3 9 12 0.500
2019-20 Wentworth D3 CNE 24 3 9 12 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2019-20 · Wentworth
+261.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10751
Defenseman overall
#1877
Defenseman born in 1998
#2069
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Suffolk · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Anna Maria · 2022-23
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2015-16
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.