IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Schairer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-01-30 Country: USA
2026 · Round 3, Pick #75  ·  St. Louis Blues St. Louis Blues
Boston University
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 50 3 21 24 0.480 0.3568 0.3619 1.7911 1.8167
2025-26 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 63 1 21 22 0.349 0.2596 0.2491 1.3030 1.2504
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

72%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6445
Defenseman overall
#415
Defenseman born in 2008

D1 Comparables

Clark Kuster
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.29 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jack Stander
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Canisius (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Will Butcher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Denver (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Clint Lewis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Cornell (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Mark Auk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

Boston University Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Tom Willander
SuperElit 2022-23
0.66
actual FR PPG at Boston University
Case McCarthy
USHL 2018-19
0.38
actual FR PPG at Boston University
Ty Gallagher
USHL 2020-21
0.47
actual FR PPG at Boston University
Carter Amico
USHL 2024-25
0.00
actual FR PPG at Boston University

D2/3 Comparables

Bailey Conger
UMass Boston · 2014-15
2.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Tyrie
Worcester State · 2022-23
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jon Whitelaw
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.