IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Caden Harvey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-02-13 Country: USA
2026 · Round 6, Pick #180  ·  Edmonton Oilers Edmonton Oilers
Penn State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 9 2 1 3 0.333 0.1966 0.2141 1.0010 1.0899
2025-26 Windsor Spitfires OHL 68 11 23 34 0.500 0.2893 0.3002 1.2848 1.3330
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17019
Forward overall
#231
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

Garrett Gamez
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Providence (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Drew Melanson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ RPI (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Evan Allen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Andrew Oglevie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Motte
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Average
NCAAe PPG

Penn State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Connor McMenamin
USHL 2016-17
0.38
actual FR PPG at Penn State
Charlie Cerrato
USHL 2022-23
1.11
actual FR PPG at Penn State
Nikita Pavlychev
USHL 2014-15
0.36
actual FR PPG at Penn State
J.J. Wiebusch
NAHL 2021-22
0.82
actual FR PPG at Penn State

D2/3 Comparables

Nate Pionk
St. Scholastica · 2014-15
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryce Grandbois
Worcester State · 2022-23
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Cooper
King's · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.