← New Search ↗ Social Card

Caden Harvey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-02-13 Country: USA
2026 · Round 6, Pick #180  ·  Edmonton Oilers Edmonton Oilers
Penn State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 9 2 1 3 0.333 0.1966 0.2141 1.0001 1.0889
2025-26 Windsor Spitfires OHL 68 11 23 34 0.500 0.2893 0.3002 1.3092 1.3583
2026-27 Windsor Spitfires OHL 4 2 1 3 0.750 0.4339 0.4339 1.9638 1.9638
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17314
Forward overall
#276
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Boston College (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Penn State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2020-21
0.72
actual FR PPG at Penn State
USHL 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at Penn State
USHL 2022-23
0.74
actual FR PPG at Penn State
BCHL 2018-19
0.27
actual FR PPG at Penn State

D2/3 Comparables

Salem State · 2005-06
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryn Athyn · 2014-15
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.