IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Kuzma Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-01-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 58 3 3 6 0.103 0.0610 0.0665 0.3106 0.3384
2022-23 — USHL 55 17 20 37 0.673 0.3968 0.4117 2.0204 2.0962
2023-24 Madison Capitols USHL 62 30 22 52 0.839 0.4947 0.4887 2.5190 2.4884
2025-26 Kingston Frontenacs OHL 69 20 19 39 0.565 0.3270 0.2896 1.4523 1.2861
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Penn State D1 BigTen — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8916
Forward overall
#355
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jason Finan
Alvernia · 2021-22
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Kolb
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2010-11
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Darren McCormick
SUNY Cortland · 2013-14
1.320 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.