IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Kuzma Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-01-29 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 58 3 3 6 0.103 0.0658 0.0717 0.3099 0.3376
2022-23 — USHL 55 17 20 37 0.673 0.4284 0.4445 2.0159 2.0915
2023-24 Madison Capitols USHL 62 30 22 52 0.839 0.5341 0.5276 2.5133 2.4828
2025-26 — OHL 69 20 19 39 0.565 0.3373 0.2987 1.4640 1.2965
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Penn State D1 BigTen — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4668
Forward overall
#217
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Kolb
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2010-11
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Darren McCormick
SUNY Cortland · 2013-14
1.320 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kailin Chen
UMass Dartmouth · 2024-25
1.454 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.