IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan DiTomaso Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-04-24 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Wilfrid Laurier Univ. · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 27 0 3 3 0.111 0.0272 0.0289 0.0765 0.0813
2019-20 Nipawin Hawks SJHL 6 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 34 0 11 11 0.324 0.0793 0.0727 0.2227 0.2041
2023-24 Wilfrid Laurier Univ. USports-M 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Wilfrid Laurier Univ. USports-M 13 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2025-26 Wilfrid Laurier Univ. USports-M 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 King's D3 MAC — 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28287
Defenseman overall
#3820
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brian Farkas
Wentworth · 2013-14
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Teagan Waugh
Manhattanville · 2012-13
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trent King
Franklin Pierce · 2023-24
0.241 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.