IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bobby Gertsakis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-09-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Ajax Attack OJHL 47 5 12 17 0.362 0.0887 0.0955 0.2476 0.2667
2008-09 Ajax Attack OJHL 36 10 19 29 0.806 0.1975 0.2026 0.5514 0.5657
2009-10 Burlington Cougars OJHL 42 2 21 23 0.548 0.1342 0.1306 0.3748 0.3648
2010-11 Burlington Cougars OJHL 38 6 21 27 0.711 0.1741 0.1614 0.4863 0.4507
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 SUNY Oswego D3 — SR 26 4 20 24 0.923
2013-14 SUNY Oswego D3 — JR 30 1 26 27 0.900
2012-13 SUNY Oswego D3 — SO 27 7 10 17 0.630
2011-12 SUNY Oswego D3 — FR 9 0 1 1 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2011-12 · SUNY Oswego
-21.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6404
Defenseman overall
#1007
Defenseman born in 1990
#1368
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Walker Hamilton
Framingham State · 2016-17
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Hopfner
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2013-14
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitchell Dolter
St. Olaf · 2017-18
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.