← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron Caron Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-06-21 Country: USA
Northeastern
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Sherwood Park Crusaders BCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Surrey Eagles BCHL 41 12 20 32 0.780 0.3007 0.3257 — —
2025-26 Omaha Lancers USHL 61 10 11 21 0.344 0.2031 0.2047 1.0331 1.0414
2026-27 Omaha Lancers USHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.1180 0.1180 0.6001 0.6001
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22499
Forward overall
#723
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG

Northeastern Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.14
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.15
actual FR PPG at Northeastern

D2/3 Comparables

Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2009-10
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2021-22
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Connecticut College · 2015-16
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.