IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Seamus Latta Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-04-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Salisbury School NE-Prep 26 1 2 3 0.115 0.0232 0.0232 0.0528 0.0528
2022-23 Salisbury School NE-Prep 28 7 6 13 0.464 0.0934 0.0934 0.2123 0.2123
2023-24 Salisbury School NE-Prep 26 14 9 23 0.885 0.1779 0.1779 0.4045 0.4045
2024-25 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 44 13 18 31 0.705 0.2714 0.2641 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2026-27 Princeton D1 ECAC SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2025-26 Princeton D1 ECAC FR 30 0 5 5 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2025-26 · Princeton
-15.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
65%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24341
Forward overall
#1362
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Devin Loe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Christian La Croix
Plymouth State · 2014-15
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kowin Belsterling
Chatham · 2022-23
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jackson Koblick
Stevenson · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.