IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eli Kim-Swallow Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-07-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 5 1 1 2 0.400 0.0980 0.1045 0.2738 0.2920
2008-09 — OJHL 44 1 6 7 0.159 0.0390 0.0396 0.1089 0.1106
2009-10 North York Rangers OJHL 43 5 21 26 0.605 0.1482 0.1427 0.4139 0.3985
2010-11 — OJHL 44 11 20 31 0.705 0.1727 0.1582 0.4822 0.4418
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 SUNY Oswego D3 — SR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 SUNY Oswego D3 — JR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 SUNY Oswego D3 — SO 21 3 2 5 0.238
2011-12 SUNY Oswego D3 — FR 2 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#34017
Forward overall
#1236
Forward born in 1990
#1960
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jon Crouse
Bethel · 2008-09
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Shawn O'Malley
Aurora · 2017-18
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jay Dardis
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.