IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alexander Donovan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-04-08 Country: USA
Denver
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2025-26 Saint John Sea Dogs QMJHL 63 25 28 53 0.841 0.4133 0.4147 2.2465 2.2540
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
70%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8649
Forward overall
#180
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Daniel Milne
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Michigan
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
Drew Smolcynski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ray Pigozzi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ UMass (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Hawkins
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Christian Heil
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Denver Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Brendan McMorrow
USHL 2024-25
0.41
actual FR PPG at Denver
Cole Guttman
USHL 2017-18
0.63
actual FR PPG at Denver
Brett Stapley
BCHL 2017-18
0.59
actual FR PPG at Denver
Liam Finlay
BCHL 2015-16
0.50
actual FR PPG at Denver

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Barrow
Wilkes · 2016-17
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Signoretti
Buffalo State · 2022-23
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2017-18
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.