icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08 | Pembroke Lumber Kings | CCHL | 24 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.125 | 0.0271 | 0.0296 | 0.0968 | 0.1056 |
| 2008-09 | — | CCHL | 51 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 0.157 | 0.0340 | 0.0351 | 0.1215 | 0.1254 |
| 2009-10 | Rockland Nationals | CCHL | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2010-11 | Trenton Golden Hawks | OJHL | 45 | 3 | 35 | 38 | 0.844 | 0.2070 | 0.1933 | 0.5780 | 0.5396 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | Fredonia | D3 | — | SR | 23 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.174 |
| 2013-14 | Fredonia | D3 | — | JR | 26 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.192 |
| 2012-13 | Fredonia | D3 | — | SO | 25 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.040 |
| 2011-12 | Fredonia | D3 | — | FR | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.