← New Search ↗ Social Card

Raine Hodge Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-05-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Pittsburgh Vengeance USPHL-Premier 9 1 1 2 0.222 0.0732 0.0732 0.0756 0.0756
2021-22 Caledon Admirals OJHL 20 1 1 2 0.100 0.0300 0.0321 0.0684 0.0731
2022-23 Syracuse Lightning USPHL-Premier 24 40 20 60 2.500 0.8240 0.8520 0.8505 0.8794
2023-24 SJHL 55 15 27 42 0.764 0.2326 0.2302 0.5659 0.5600
2024-25 Melville Millionaires SJHL 38 7 15 22 0.579 0.1763 0.1650 0.4290 0.4015
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Canton D3 SUNYAC FR 8 1 1 2 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2025-26 · Canton
+52.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29435
Forward overall
#1733
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Finlandia · 2009-10
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
New England · 2016-17
0.483 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2024-25
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.