IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Hawkrigg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-06-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Bramalea Blues OJHL 44 11 23 34 0.773 0.1894 0.2103 0.5289 0.5873
2009-10 — OJHL 45 15 30 45 1.000 0.2451 0.2593 0.6845 0.7242
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Trinity D3 NESCAC SR 19 4 12 16 0.842
2014-15 Trinity D3 NESCAC JR 29 16 21 37 1.276
2013-14 Trinity D3 NESCAC SO 25 22 30 52 2.080
2012-13 Trinity D3 NESCAC FR 24 9 9 18 0.750
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.75
2012-13 · Trinity
+265.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18466
Forward overall
#700
Forward born in 1992
#696
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Mike Marnell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Frederik Tiffels
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dylan McLaughlin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Canisius (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Avery Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dawson Cook
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Busby
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2000-01
0.903 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cameron Wright
Stonehill · 2015-16
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Steve Schroeder
Norwich · 2005-06
0.742 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.