Tommy Bleyl Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-12-01 Country: USA

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2023-24	Albany Academy	NE-Prep	27	9	11	20	0.741	0.1493	0.1493	0.3390	0.3390
2024-25	Cushing Academy	NE-Prep	30	6	21	27	0.900	0.1814	0.1814	—	—
2025-26	Moncton Wildcats	QMJHL	63	13	68	81	1.286	0.6403	0.6632	3.4305	3.5533

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

Age-Out / Club

88%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#602

Defenseman overall

#172

Defenseman born in 2007

D2/3 Comparables

Arkhip Ledenkov

St. Scholastica · 2018-19

1.636 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Neil Trimm

Neumann · 2003-04

1.800 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Filimon Ledenkov

St. Scholastica · 2018-19

1.636 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.