← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mason Minor Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-09-02 Country: USA
Minnesota State
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Benilde-St. Margaret's USHS-MN 26 4 17 21 0.808 0.1023 0.1023 0.1962 0.1962
2023-24 Benilde-St. Margaret's USHS-MN 27 7 20 27 1.000 0.1266 0.1266 0.2429 0.2429
2024-25 Benilde-St. Margaret's USHS-MN 25 10 29 39 1.560 0.1975 0.1975
2025-26 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 55 1 17 18 0.327 0.1931 0.1966 0.9830 1.0007
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

88%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3543
Defenseman overall
#499
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Minnesota State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2014-15
0.20
actual FR PPG at Minnesota State
USHL 2017-18
0.00
actual FR PPG at Minnesota State
NAHL 2013-14
0.29
actual FR PPG at Minnesota State
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.03
actual FR PPG at Minnesota State

D2/3 Comparables

Augsburg · 2014-15
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Middlebury · 2011-12
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.