IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jaxon Herchak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-08-15 Country: Canada
Colorado College
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Kindersley Klippers SJHL 1 0 1 1 1.000 0.2562 0.2953 0.7538 0.8688
2024-25 Kindersley Klippers SJHL 48 5 27 32 0.667 0.1708 0.1877 0.5026 0.5523
2025-26 Kindersley Klippers SJHL 15 2 8 10 0.667 0.1708 0.1788 0.5026 0.5260
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6688
Defenseman overall
#935
Defenseman born in 2007
#487
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Doyle Somerby
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Leibinger
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Colorado College Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Nate Schweitzer
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.16
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
Brady Smith
USHL 2018-19
0.04
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
Nicklas Andrews
USHL 2019-20
0.14
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
Nick Baer
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Colorado College

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Smietana
Fredonia · 2000-01
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Johnathon Mead
Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Roberts
Manhattanville · 2022-23
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.