← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Smietana Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1982-07-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Buffalo Lightning OJHL 37 12 22 34 0.919 0.2567 0.2543 0.6341 0.6281
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 Fredonia D3 SO 3 0 1 1 0.333
2004-05 Fredonia D3 FR 7 1 3 4 0.571
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.57
2004-05 · Fredonia
+162.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13942
Forward overall
#489
Forward born in 1982
#807
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Michigan
0.27 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Vermont (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nichols · 2005-06
0.765 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2003-04
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.