IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

James Ryan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Toronto Patriots OJHL 1 0 1 1 1.000 0.3004 0.3004 0.6845 0.6845
2010-11 Toronto Patriots OJHL 50 20 22 42 0.840 0.2523 0.2523 0.5750 0.5750
2011-12 Toronto Patriots OJHL 49 16 33 49 1.000 0.3004 0.3004 0.6845 0.6845
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 SUNY Brockport D3 — SR 22 2 8 10 0.455
2014-15 SUNY Brockport D3 — JR 25 7 7 14 0.560
2013-14 SUNY Brockport D3 — SO 26 8 6 14 0.538
2012-13 SUNY Brockport D3 — FR 24 3 7 10 0.417
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2012-13 · SUNY Brockport
+73.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17605
Forward overall
#787
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Horton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Aston-Reese
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joey Schaefer
Nazareth · 2018-19
0.733 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ashton Collazo
Framingham State · 2018-19
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Principato
Wentworth · 2006-07
1.389 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.