← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joey Schaefer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-09-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier 42 16 23 39 0.929 0.3061 0.3205 0.3159 0.3307
2019-20 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 41 13 19 32 0.780 0.2747 0.2747 0.3827 0.3827
2020-21 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 37 17 20 37 1.000 0.3519 0.3519 0.4903 0.4903
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Nazareth D3 UCHC SR 26 6 10 16 0.615
2023-24 Nazareth D3 UCHC JR 25 1 8 9 0.360
2022-23 Nazareth D3 UCHC SO 28 7 8 15 0.536
2021-22 Nazareth D3 UCHC FR 15 5 6 11 0.733
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.73
2021-22 · Nazareth
+167.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
82%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14149
Forward overall
#578
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nazareth · 2014-15
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2021-22
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Skidmore · 2005-06
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.