← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joey Schaefer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-09-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier 42 16 23 39 0.929 0.1215 0.1272 0.3152 0.3300
2019-20 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 41 13 19 32 0.780 0.1803 0.1803 0.3819 0.3819
2020-21 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 37 17 20 37 1.000 0.2310 0.2310 0.4893 0.4893
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Nazareth D3 UCHC SR 26 6 10 16 0.615
2023-24 Nazareth D3 UCHC JR 25 1 8 9 0.360
2022-23 Nazareth D3 UCHC SO 28 7 8 15 0.536
2021-22 Nazareth D3 UCHC FR 15 5 6 11 0.733
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.73
2021-22 · Nazareth
+573.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
88%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14773
Forward overall
#633
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nazareth · 2014-15
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2021-22
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Skidmore · 2005-06
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.