IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joey Macrina Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-01-09 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Quinnipiac
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 28 3 11 14 0.500 0.1926 0.1947 0.7277 0.7356
2025-26 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 59 19 22 41 0.695 0.4099 0.3836 2.0871 1.9530
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

68%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13730
Forward overall
#534
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

Gerald Mayhew
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Chad McDonald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Quinnipiac Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Canon Pieper
BCHL 2013-14
0.08
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
Odeen Tufto
USHL 2016-17
1.08
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
William Fällström
USHL 2017-18
0.55
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
Victor Czerneckianair
USHL 2021-22
0.20
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac

D2/3 Comparables

Lee Stubbs
Manhattanville · 2000-01
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Cyprian
Chatham · 2021-22
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dylan Clarke
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2006-07
1.267 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.