IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Greg Ryan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-07-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 51 11 9 20 0.392 0.0961 0.0973 0.2700 0.2734
2010-11 — OJHL 42 11 16 27 0.643 0.1576 0.1523 0.4426 0.4276
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SO 14 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC FR 16 1 2 3 0.188
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2012-13 · SUNY Cortland
+68.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#34753
Forward overall
#1206
Forward born in 1991
#2004
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bronson Zoltán Kovács
Hobart · 2009-10
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Roethke
Concordia · 2023-24
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Wilson
Lebanon Valley · 2006-07
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.