IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sean Wilson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-07-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Burlington Cougars OJHL 48 18 27 45 0.938 0.2298 0.2324 0.6455 0.6529
2006-07 Burlington Cougars OJHL 48 29 30 59 1.229 0.3013 0.2897 0.8463 0.8136
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC SR 20 1 2 3 0.150
2008-09 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC JR 21 1 3 4 0.191
2007-08 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC SO 22 4 4 8 0.364
2006-07 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC FR 20 1 6 7 0.350
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2006-07 · Lebanon Valley
+76.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13405
Forward overall
#459
Forward born in 1987
#359
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Brett Skibba
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Irwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
Garret Clemment
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
John Simonson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cory Park
Buffalo State · 2006-07
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Christian Lloyd
Elmira · 2014-15
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Orrin Hergott
St. Norbert · 2001-02
0.839 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.