IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Colavecchia Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-05-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Streetsville Derbys (OLD) OJHL 47 3 7 10 0.213 0.0522 0.0553 0.1465 0.1552
2009-10 North York Rangers OJHL 50 14 5 19 0.380 0.0931 0.0938 0.2616 0.2635
2010-11 North York Rangers OJHL 46 14 13 27 0.587 0.1439 0.1382 0.4041 0.3882
2011-12 North York Rangers OJHL 47 20 21 41 0.872 0.2138 0.1959 0.6006 0.5504
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC FR 25 1 2 3 0.120
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2012-13 · SUNY Brockport
-18.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28296
Forward overall
#1006
Forward born in 1991
#1405
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luc Boby
Utica · 2012-13
0.882 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Morton
Curry · 2024-25
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kelby Lorenz
Southern Maine · 2012-13
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.