IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ludvig Lafton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-01-11 Country: Norway
2024 · Round 6, Pick #190  ·  Utah Hockey Club Utah Hockey Club
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Maine
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 — SuperElit 16 0 4 4 0.250 0.0987 0.1018 0.3395 0.3500
2024-25 — SuperElit 42 4 15 19 0.452 0.1785 0.1750 0.6144 0.6024
2025-26 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 56 2 33 35 0.625 0.3687 0.3451 1.8771 1.7569
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

90%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3334
Defenseman overall
#679
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

Barrett Kaib
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Newell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Fleming
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Connor Murphy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Maine Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Loic Usereau
QMJHL 2024-25
0.23
actual FR PPG at Maine
Sam Becker
NAHL 2014-15
0.10
actual FR PPG at Maine
Tim Gould
BCHL 2019-20
0.18
actual FR PPG at Maine
Luke Coughlin
QMJHL 2024-25
0.20
actual FR PPG at Maine

D2/3 Comparables

Roman Ammirato
Utica · 2012-13
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bailey Conger
UMass Boston · 2016-17
2.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brian Berger
Marian · 2010-11
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.