IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Peter Kazakis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1991-02-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Pickering Panthers OJHL 9 0 1 1 0.111 0.0272 0.0298 0.0765 0.0839
2008-09 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 50 4 6 10 0.200 0.0490 0.0512 0.1377 0.1439
2009-10 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 48 3 14 17 0.354 0.0868 0.0861 0.2439 0.2420
2010-11 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 42 1 15 16 0.381 0.0934 0.0883 0.2623 0.2481
2011-12 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 44 2 9 11 0.250 0.0613 0.0553 0.1721 0.1552
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Castleton D3 LittleEast — 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#18010
Defenseman overall
#1735
Defenseman born in 1991
#3513
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cory Gottfried
Tufts · 2015-16
0.278 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Kramer
Buffalo State · 2011-12
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Alvarado
Plymouth State · 2024-25
0.174 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.