IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cory Gottfried Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-02-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 P.A.L. Junior Islanders USPHL-Premier-Classic 36 0 9 9 0.250 0.0702 0.0697 0.2059 0.2044
2015-16 P.A.L. Junior Islanders USPHL-Premier-Classic 43 7 17 24 0.558 0.1567 0.1479 0.4597 0.4338
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Tufts D1 — SR 24 5 3 8 0.333
2019-20 Tufts D3 NESCAC SR 24 5 3 8 0.333
2018-19 Tufts D1 — JR 23 1 3 4 0.174
2018-19 Tufts D3 NESCAC JR 23 1 3 4 0.174
2017-18 Tufts D3 NESCAC SO 23 1 2 3 0.130
2016-17 Tufts D3 NESCAC FR 18 1 4 5 0.278
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2016-17 · Tufts
+152.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13966
Defenseman overall
#1798
Defenseman born in 1995
#194
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trevor Veneklase
SUNY Cortland · 2018-19
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Ryback
Concordia · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Gavin Bloder
Fredonia · 2023-24
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.