← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gunnar Conboy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-04-02 Country: USA
Minnesota
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Lakeville North USHS-MN 26 13 7 20 0.769 0.0974 0.0974 0.1868 0.1868
2024-25 Lakeville North USHS-MN 27 24 16 40 1.482 0.1876 0.1876 0.3599 0.3599
2025-26 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 37 12 9 21 0.568 0.3348 0.3673 1.7047 1.8703
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

82%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13410
Forward overall
#39
Forward born in 2009

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.32 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Yale (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.54 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.74 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Boston College (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Minnesota Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2019-20
0.21
actual FR PPG at Minnesota
USHL 2012-13
0.00
actual FR PPG at Minnesota
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Minnesota
USHL 2019-20
0.79
actual FR PPG at Minnesota

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2000-01
1.226 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2000-01
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.