IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ty Bergeron Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-05-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 55 6 14 20 0.364 0.2145 0.2369 1.0920 1.2062
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24960
Forward overall
#100
Forward born in 2009
#2411
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Dakota Joshua
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Tait
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Providence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Grasso
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.82 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Alex Tuch
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Boston College (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Joe Wegwerth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Scott Hudson
Manhattanville · 2004-05
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
John Barrett
Wilkes · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Alexei Filimonov
Fitchburg State · 2021-22
1.560 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.