IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tanner Bull Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-04-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Pickering Panthers OJHL 46 15 8 23 0.500 0.1397 0.1412 0.3451 0.3488
2012-13 Pickering Panthers OJHL 52 11 9 20 0.385 0.1075 0.1033 0.2654 0.2550
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 25 3 8 11 0.440
2016-17 Concordia Wisconsin D3 — SR 25 3 8 11 0.440
2015-16 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 26 2 7 9 0.346
2015-16 Concordia Wisconsin D3 — JR 26 2 7 9 0.346
2014-15 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 27 10 7 17 0.630
2014-15 Concordia Wisconsin D3 — SO 27 10 7 17 0.630
2013-14 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 27 6 7 13 0.481
2013-14 Concordia Wisconsin D3 — FR 27 6 7 13 0.481
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2013-14 · Concordia
+374.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33364
Forward overall
#1327
Forward born in 1993
#3098
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Mike Robinson
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ New Hampshire
0.11 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.14 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Dau
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Air Force (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sami Salminen
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Will O'Neill
Worcester State · 2007-08
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Stewart Sjoberg
Neumann · 2003-04
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Swanson
St. Thomas · 2018-19
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.