IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stephen Johnson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-03-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Bramalea Blues OJHL 54 3 9 12 0.222 0.0545 0.0597 0.1521 0.1667
2010-11 Toronto Patriots OJHL 42 5 16 21 0.500 0.1226 0.1286 0.3422 0.3590
2011-12 Cornwall Colts CCHL 43 2 17 19 0.442 0.0958 0.0959 0.3421 0.3423
2012-13 Cornwall Colts CCHL 60 9 28 37 0.617 0.1338 0.1280 0.4774 0.4566
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 SUNY Oswego D3 — SR 27 7 23 30 1.111
2015-16 SUNY Oswego D3 — JR 26 2 7 9 0.346
2014-15 SUNY Oswego D3 — SO 26 5 11 16 0.615
2013-14 SUNY Oswego D3 — FR 30 4 8 12 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2013-14 · SUNY Oswego
+268.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8921
Defenseman overall
#1153
Defenseman born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrue Trelstad
Wisconsin-Stout · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Reinholz
Hamline · 2012-13
0.759 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Schmidling
St. Norbert · 2017-18
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.